<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Certian — Register Changelog</title>
<link>https://certian.com/changelog</link>
<atom:link href="https://certian.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<description>What changed in the record: date-stamped entries from the independent register of AI governance. Facts, corrections, and instruments — not commentary.</description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:20:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>A seventh filer, and the earliest carrier approval in the index</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-28-a</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Great American Insurance Group filed ten commercial umbrella and excess endorsements in Washington on 27 October 2025, two of them generative AI exclusions — UMS 20 05 01 26 and UMU 20 45 01 26. No objection letter was issued and the filing was approved on 14 November 2025, eighteen days after submission. That is the earliest approval of a carrier&apos;s own generative AI exclusion recorded here.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Correction — a filing date was wrong by two days</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-28-b</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The entry for a carrier&apos;s generative AI exclusion in Texas general liability gave the filing date as 25 February 2026. That is the date of the same carrier&apos;s businessowners filing; the general liability filing was submitted on 23 February 2026. The withdrawal date, the schedule item status date and the fourteen objections are unchanged.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The advisory filing pending in Texas has now been pending one year</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-28-c</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Submitted 28 August 2025, re-read 28 August 2026, still undisposed and still with the Director. The two forms withdrawn from that filing on 13 July 2026 are now named, and neither is a generative AI exclusion. Neither of the department&apos;s two most recent objection letters concerns the AI forms.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>One state asks insurers whether AI wrote the filing</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-26-c</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>From 1 May 2026 every new rate and form filing submitted to Washington must state whether AI was used to prepare it, and a yes requires the filer to name the tool and describe its impact. This governs the use of AI in preparing a document submitted to a regulator — not an insurer&apos;s use of AI in underwriting or claims. Of eight state systems read here, only Washington asks; two filers have answered and both said no. Also corrected: three entries showed an edition date in a column a reader would take for an effective date.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The public filing system moved address without notice — every source link repointed</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-26-a</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>SERFF Filing Access per-state pages moved from filingaccess.serff.com to serff-sfa.naic.org. The old paths return not-found and the old bare domain returns access-forbidden with no forward pointer. Every source link in the index was repointed and all eight state pages confirmed to load; both addresses are recorded so the change can be followed. This is why the tracking numbers, not the addresses, are the citable identifiers.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Liberty Mutual&apos;s AI exclusion recorded — a seventh filer, approved in Washington</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-26-b</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>LCU 21 260 08 26, Exclusion — Generative Artificial Intelligence, filed 29 June 2026 for commercial umbrella and excess and approved 13 August, effective 1 August. The one objection letter in the filing concerned two deductible forms, not this one. The product name in the search grid is simply Commercial Umbrella, so no keyword query would have found it: named in a commercial tracker, located by filer name, confirmed against the filing. Sixty entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — three signatory names were misspelled here, each by one character</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-24-b</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The Commission records Vucable, Omilia NLS Ltd and ABthreeC GmbH; this census carried Vulcable, Omnilia NLS Ltd and AbthreeC GmbH, and had since 2 August. All three are corrected on the page and in the downloads. Found by comparing every name against the Commission&apos;s published list, not reported by anyone: the remaining 232 matched exactly and no count was affected. Also confirmed against the source: the Commission states 82 Section 1 signatories and lists 83 names, while Section 2 reconciles exactly at 152.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who signed the EU Code of Practice on AI-Generated Content — now answerable one organisation at a time</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-22-a</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>190 distinct organisations, filterable by name, each row showing whether it signed Section 1 as a provider, Section 2 as a deployer, or both. The 45 that signed both sections are named rather than asserted: the overlap is computed from the Commission&apos;s own two lists and the arithmetic holds exactly — 83, 152, 45, 190. The census is published as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0 so the count can be checked rather than taken.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — this register promised a cadence it does not owe</title>
<link>https://certian.com/changelog</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-21-c</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Nine statements across five pages said sweeps run weekly or that a record is continuously updated. All nine now describe the practice instead: sweeps are hand-conducted, each is entered in the changelog with its date, no schedule is promised, and the date on an entry is the date it was last confirmed. A standing note on the filings index now also records what the index does not cover — forty-two states unread, two filings undisposed, three effective dates recorded that fall after today.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Which states have accepted the ISO AI exclusions — and what &quot;accepted&quot; means in each</title>
<link>https://certian.com/faq</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-21-a</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Eight states read. One approved the forms on their merits. Four recorded them under file-and-use, which is acceptance onto the record rather than review. One filed them alongside five objection letters about other forms. One has neither approved nor disapproved after twelve months. In one, the filer&apos;s general liability filings do not appear in the state system at all. Each state&apos;s own disposition wording and the effective date it set are now published together.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ten entries added — and a filing that was not what the pattern predicted</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-21-b</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Six filings listed yesterday as located but unread have been read. The Hartford&apos;s Spectrum AI exclusions carry four forms in Connecticut and two in Pennsylvania — a difference invisible from the product name or the tracking numbers. Utica National&apos;s exclusion is recorded in three Pennsylvania lines and one Connecticut line, each disposed within four days. The index stands at fifty-nine entries. Also recorded: adopting an advisory revision is not the same as attaching a form to a policy, and no state filing system establishes the latter.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — this register was repeating the effective-date claim its own filings contradict</title>
<link>https://certian.com/faq</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-20-d</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The questions page stated the ISO generative AI endorsements were effective from 1 January 2026. They carry the edition date 01 26, which is not an effective date: the filer states it sets none in a state, and the seven states read give four different answers. Corrected on the page and in its structured data, sourced to the filings by tracking number.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The ISO AI exclusions take effect on four different dates — and in Texas on none</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-20-a</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Seven states&apos; filing records read. Pennsylvania and Washington set 1 January 2026; Illinois 1 February, moved from 1 January; Connecticut 1 March; Colorado records that the filer sets no effective date there; Ohio set none; Texas has neither approved nor disapproved the forms, so no effective date exists. A single national effective date is not what the filings show. The index stands at forty-nine entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Hartford: nine proprietary AI exclusions, two families, effective September and October</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-20-b</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Five generative AI exclusions for general liability filed in Pennsylvania on 10 August 2026, disposed the same day, effective 10 October — a different family from the four package and umbrella forms effective 12 September. The filing states the company is adopting the ISO 2025 revision it had previously non-adopted, and names its own earlier non-adoption by tracking number.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Connecticut recorded the withdrawn Texas endorsement effective before Texas objected</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-20-c</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Utica National&apos;s generative AI exclusion was recorded effective in Connecticut on 26 February 2026. Texas objected on 3 March and the form was withdrawn there on 6 March. The endorsement is now recorded in five states and Texas is the only one where it did not survive. Also recorded: no two states name their dispositions alike, so the raw status strings now sit alongside this index&apos;s four terms.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Five states read: the ISO generative AI exclusions clear four, and Texas is the outlier</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-g</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 22:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The same advisory filing carrying CG 40 47, CG 40 48 and CG 35 08 was located in Texas, Colorado, Washington, Illinois and Ohio. Washington approved it in nineteen days with no objection; Ohio filed it in six, Colorado in five. Illinois issued five objection letters over eleven months, none about the AI exclusions. Texas has issued seven, has neither approved nor disapproved, and the filing remains pending after twelve months. The index stands at thirty-six entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Utica&apos;s AI exclusion cleared two states in the week Texas objected</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-h</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 22:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Illinois filed it on 2 March 2026 after one question; Washington approved it the same day, three days after submission. Texas objected on 3 March and the carrier withdrew from two Texas filings on 4 and 6 March. The Texas withdrawals are a fact about Texas. The form numbers differ by line, so a form-number search would have found one and missed the others. A second Texas withdrawal, in general liability, is also now recorded.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Hartford filed four AI exclusions, effective 12 September 2026</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-i</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Four proprietary generative AI exclusions across commercial package and umbrella, filed in Washington and Illinois at the end of June 2026. Washington approved them the next day. Illinois asked one question and filed them. The same forms do not appear in Ohio, where the rest of that programme does. Also recorded: carriers filing explicit non-adoptions and delayed adoptions of the advisory cycle, which is a separate question from whether a regulator approved it.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ISO generative AI exclusions located in Texas — filed August 2025, still not approved</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-d</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Insurance Services Office, Inc. filed CG 40 47 and CG 40 48 in Texas on 28 August 2025 within its 2025 General Liability Multistate Endorsement Update. Almost twelve months on the filing has no disposition and neither form carries a schedule item status. The Texas Department of Insurance issued seven objection letters; in November 2025 a reviewer stated the exclusions are overly broad and that the department was unable to approve exclusions that could remove coverage that would otherwise exist, and asked the filer to withdraw or narrow them. The filer declined and has not revised them since. An objection letter is not a disapproval: the department has neither approved nor disapproved these forms and the filing remains pending. One state, one department.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — an edition date was recorded as an effective date</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-e</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Three advisory generative AI exclusion entries were recorded as Effective from 1 January 2026, which is the forms&apos; edition date. The filer states it does not set an effective date in a state; each insurer electing the revision determines its own. The entries now record the national edition under a new jurisdiction value, Multistate, with state-by-state status held as separate entries. Texas is the first and reads Filed.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>A benchmark recorded before the measuring — 46 jurisdictions, stated but not listed</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-f</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Asked by Texas to name the states that had approved CG 40 47 and CG 40 48 and give their tracking numbers, the filer answered that the forms are implemented in 46 jurisdictions and supplied no list; four months earlier it had said 43 and used the word approved. Recorded as the filer&apos;s own statement, not as a count. It is also the first external number this register&apos;s state sweep can be compared against, and the comparison is stated now rather than afterwards. Texas also removed the form filing requirement for eighteen kinds of commercial insurance in 2021, which the method statement now records as a stated limit on what any sweep there can see.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Generative AI exclusion withdrawn in Texas after regulator objections</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-a</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Utica National Insurance Group filed endorsement 8-E-4460 Ed. 01-2026, Exclusion — Generative Artificial Intelligence, for Texas Businessowners policies on 25 February 2026. The Texas Department of Insurance objected on 3 March 2026 with fourteen objections directed at that endorsement. On 6 March the company answered all fourteen with the same sentence, a request to withdraw the form without prejudice. The Department stamped the form withdrawn on 13 March and closed the filing as approved on 20 March — that approval reaching a different endorsement in the same filing. First entry recorded as Withdrawn, first from a state filing system, first sourced to a regulator&apos;s own correspondence. Eleven entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sweep record — Texas, and what SERFF Filing Access can actually be asked</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-b</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Texas was searched on 19 August 2026 on insurance product name containing &quot;artificial,&quot; type of insurance left unset; one filing returned. The interface offers no form-number field and no full-text search, so form-number queries cannot be run in it — company name and product name are the only text fields and both are assigned by the filer. A nil result from a query of this kind carries correspondingly little weight. The index also gains a jurisdiction column, and now distinguishes a filing&apos;s status from the status of an individual form inside it.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — ten pages were displaying the visit date in place of the recorded date</title>
<link>https://certian.com/changelog</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-19-c</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A script on the homepage, the questions page, both maps, the signatory tracker and three guides overwrote every &quot;recorded,&quot; &quot;last reviewed,&quot; &quot;status as of&quot; and &quot;updated&quot; stamp with the date the reader visited. The dates written into the pages were correct; the script replaced them on every view. A second script filled the &quot;Register entry&quot; stamp on the homepage and the questions page with the reader&apos;s own date, under a label that states when an entry was made. Both scripts are removed and the recorded dates now display as recorded. Ten pages affected; the defect had been live since 15 July 2026.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>AI Coverage Litigation Register opened — no decided case recorded</title>
<link>https://certian.com/litigation</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-18-a</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A new register instrument records decided US cases turning on an AI exclusion endorsement or an affirmative AI liability policy. It opens with no decided case recorded, published before its first entry so that the dated series of readings across the interval exists at all. A nil is a record of a reading, not a finding about the world. Two page footers were corrected the same day, and every promise of permanence was withdrawn across four surfaces: nothing here is committed in perpetuity, including the keeping of the records themselves.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — Berkley PC 51380 line of business, E&amp;O to EPL</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-17-f</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The Berkley entry recorded the endorsement as reaching D&amp;O, E&amp;O and Fiduciary Liability. The form amends Directors and Officers, Employment Practices Liability and Fiduciary Liability coverage parts; Errors and Omissions is not among them. The entry now carries the full designation PC 51380 00 (06-24), a June 2024 edition date, and the endorsement form as its source. A source was also attached to the aiSure entry; every entry in the index now carries one.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>One entry appended — AI Insurance Filings Index at ten</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-17-e</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>AmTrust Financial Services is recorded on the exclusion side after stating on 23 July 2026 that it is incorporating AI exclusions into its policies broadly. Recorded as Filed; no approval or date of effect confirmed. Form number CU990052 1025 recorded as reported, not confirmed. Ten entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Two entries appended — AI Insurance Filings Index at nine</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-17-c</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Mayflower Specialty and Hadron’s Affirmative AI Liability Program (24 June 2026; D&amp;O, EPL, E&amp;O; US$5M limits) and Testudo’s Generative AI Liability Insurance at Lloyd’s (underwriting from January 2026; limits to US$9.25M recorded March 2026) move from the under-examination queue on multi-source confirmation. Nine entries.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Instrument opened — AI Certification Comparison</title>
<link>https://certian.com/certifications</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-17-b</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Four AI certification and assurance pathways — ISO/IEC 42001, IEEE CertifAIEd, the Responsible AI Institute, and the Nemko AI Trust Mark — set against the same attributes, including what each does and does not confer under the EU AI Act. No harmonised standard under the AI Act mandate has yet been cited in the Official Journal; none of the four confers a presumption of conformity.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Census refreshed — signatory list as currently published</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-17-a</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The census now reproduces the Commission’s signatory list as currently published (retrieved 17 August 2026). Recording policy stated: counts and substantive changes are recorded; source-page housekeeping is not, and a party’s name is not retained after it ceases to appear on the Commission’s list.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Update recorded — AI Omnibus adopted (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744)</title>
<link>https://certian.com/changelog</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-14-a</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The AI Omnibus entered into force 27 July 2026. Article 50 applies from 2 August 2026 as scheduled; the Article 50(2) machine-readable marking grace for systems on the market before 2 August runs to 2 December 2026. Register citations upgraded from the provisional agreement to the regulation.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Index refined, downloads added — AI Insurance Filings Index</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-12-b</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The method statement now states the register's non-promotion rule in full — an edition is recorded as an edition, an approval as an approval. The CG 40 47 01 26 entry carries an evidence note, and the record is downloadable as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Instrument opened — AI Insurance Filings Index</title>
<link>https://certian.com/filings</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-12-a</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>A two-sided record of AI insurance filings — exclusion endorsements and affirmative AI liability products in one fixed schema, opening with seven entries: the three ISO/Verisk generative-AI exclusion forms (CG 40 47 01 26, CG 40 48 01 26, CG 35 08 01 26), the W. R. Berkley absolute AI exclusion (PC 51380), and three affirmative records (Armilla at Lloyd's, Chaucer–Armilla Vanguard AI, Munich Re aiSure via Mosaic). Weekly sweeps; findings appended.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Count recorded — Commission signatory page</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-10-a</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The Commission's signatory page states Section 1 — 82 · Section 2 — 152, as retrieved 8 and 10 August. No organisation was added or withdrawn against the initial list; the census is refreshed to the published list.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Instrument renamed — Signatory Register</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-10-b</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The Signatory Tracker becomes the Signatory Register — "tracker" is retired from the register's self-description. Records, series, and URL unchanged; historical entries retain their original wording.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Definition revised — "Certian"</title>
<link>https://certian.com/lexicon</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-10-c</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The entry is re-sequenced: etymology and record-keeper lineage lead, and "one letter short of certain, by design" closes as the epigraph. A second sense is added for the register itself. The homepage now carries the entry in dictionary form.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Correction — Commission signing FAQ revision of 29 July</title>
<link>https://certian.com/signatories</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">certian-changelog-2026-08-06-a</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>The Commission revised its signing FAQ on 29 July (27 July deadline restored, content expanded). The register's 2–3 August observations were of cached copies; a correction is appended rather than the entry rewritten, on the signatory page and Q.09.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
